AZ Guide u CLINICAL TRIAL
HEART

ALIVE
- ALIVE trial is evaluating the effect of Azimilide, an Class
III antiarrhythmic agent, in reducing mortality in post myocardial infarction patients
with depressed ejection fractions.
- Six thousands patients will be recruit. All patients will be
randomised to Azimilide or placebo.
BEST
The Beta-Blocker Evaluation Survival Trial
Background and
Rationale
Numerous studies suggest that beta-blockade
improves ventricular function in congestive heart failure (CHF) and several mortality
trials, as outlined below, suggest that beta-blockers may also reduce mortality.
n Beta-blocker
Heart Attack Trial (BHAT)1
In this study, patients after myocardial
infarction (MI) were randomised to the non-selective beta-blocker Propranolol or placebo
to determine the influence on mortality. The results showed that patients with a history
of heart failure had a greater reduction of cardiac and sudden death mortality than those
with no history of heart failure.
n Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST)2
The influence of beta-blockade on mortality
was analysed in all enrolled CAST postmyocardial patients with an ejection fraction <40%.
In these patients beta-blocker therapy significantly reduced mortality vs. patients who
did not receive beta-blockade.
n The Metroprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Trial (MDC)3
This trial evaluated the effect of the
selective beta-blocker Metoprolol vs. placebo on mortality and the need for heart
transplantation in patients with idiopathic cardiomyopathy. There was a trend toward
reduction in this morbidity and mortality end point in Metoprolol treated patients, but
this was due entirely to a reduction in the need for transplantation.
As outlined above, the concept that beta-blockers definitively reduce mortality in CHF
patients, remains to be proven.
BEST aims to determine whether the
addition of beta-blockade (Bucindolol) to standard CHF therapy will reduce total mortality
in patients with moderate to severe heart failure (NYHA class III or IV)4
Why use a non-selective beta-blocker?4
n In
cardiomyopathy trials, beta-1 selective agents did not reduce cardiac death.
n In secondary
prevention trials, beta-1 selective agents also failed to show a reduction in sudden
cardiac death.
n Non-selective
beta-blockade has been shown to reduce sudden cardiac death in post MI patients,
suggesting that non-selective beta-blockade may be more effective in reducing mortality
than beta-1 selective therapy.
What is BEST?4
BEST is co-sponsored by the U.S. National
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
Study design:
Randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicentre
trial
Evaluating 2800 patients from all CHF population (1400 per
arm)
Dose titration over a period of 6 weeks
Followed-up for 18 (minimum) to 54 months
Primary Endpoint:
Total mortality
Secondary Endpoint
Cardiovascular mortality (total, due to worsening heart
failure, due to sudden death)
Quality of life
Hospitalisations and costs
Left ventricular ejection fraction at 3 and 12 months of
therapy
Incidence of myocardial infarction
Combined transplant/mortality endpoint
Changes in the need for co-therapy
Furthermore, the impact of aetiology; race,
ejection fraction and gender on outcomes will be assessed.
Inclusion Criteria:
Men and women over 18 years of age
Compensated congestive heart failure due to idiopathic
dilated cardiomyopathy or coronary artery disease
NYHA functional class III or IV
Left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%
Patients taking standard congestive heart failure treatment
(ACE inhibitor, digitalis and if needed, a diuretic)
Why Bucindolol?4
- Non-selective beta-blocker
- Well tolerated in moderate to severe heart failure
- Weak vasodilator (avoids difficulty in determining whether
beta-blockade or vasodilatation is responsible for any treatment effects)
References:
- Chadda K et al. Circulation 1986; 73; 503-510
- Kennedy HL et al. Circulation 1992; 86 (suppl 1); I-403
- Waagstein F et al. Lancet 1993; 342; 1141-1146
- Design of the Beta-Blocker Evaluation Survival Trial (BEST),
Am J Cardiol 1995; 75:1220-1223
CAPTURE
CAPTURE trial is a multicenter, randomised
study which has demontrated that platelet inhibition with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
antibody abcximab reduces risk for myocardial infarction in patients with refractory
unstable angina prior and during coronary baloon angioplasty.
CARE
Cholesterol and Recurrent Events
CARE trial is a 5-year study, involving
4159 patients, survived a myocardial infarct.
In the Pravastatin-treated group, there was a 25% reduction in relative risk of having
another coronary event.
The relative risk of needing coronary artery bypass or angioplasty was reduced by 32%.
A post doc subgroup analysis shows that
non-diabetic patients defined as glucose intolerant, who received Pravastatin had a lower
rate of coronary events than patients given placebo.
[Sacks V et al. Circulation 1998; 98:
2513-2519]
CAST
Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial
- The CAST was designed to assess whether pharmacological
suppression of asympomatic or mildly symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias in patients who
had experienced an myocardial infarction (MI), would reduce the rate of arrhythmia-
associated death.
- Patients were randomised to receive treatment with
Encainide, Flecainide, Moracizine, or matching placebo.
- In April 1989, on the basis of interim results, Encainide
and Flecainide were withdrawn from CAST because the drugs appeared to be harmful.
- The revised CAST (CAST II) continued with Moracizine.
[N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 781-788]
DIAMOND
Danish Investigation of Arrhythmia and Mortality on Dofetilide
The trial has enrolled 3.000
patients.
Dofetilide is a selective potassium channel
blocker.
GUSTO IIb
A clinical trial comparing primary coronary
angioplasty with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction.
N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1621-1628
Purpose |
to compare
primary coronary angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial
infarction. |
Primary end
points |
Composite
outcome of death, nonfatal reinfarction, and nonfatal disabling stroke within 30 days. |
Patients |
No: 1138,
presenting within 12 hours of acute myocardial infarction (with ST-segment elevation on
the ECG). |
OASIS Pilot Study
Organization to Assess Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes.
- Patients with acute ischemic syndromes present recurrent
ischemic events despite the use of Aspirin.
- These recurrent ischemic events are a consequence of an
ongoing thrombotic stimulus.
- OASIS Pilot Study has studied the effects of long-term
Warfarin at 2 intensities in patients with acute ischemic syndromes (AIS) without ST
elevation.
- Long-term treatment with moderate-intensity Warfarin (INR
2.0-2.5) plus Aspirin but not low-intensity Warfarin (INR 1.5) plus Aspirin appears to
reduce the rate of recurrent ischemic events in patients with AIS without ST elevation
(Circulation 1998; 98: 1064-1070)
RALES Trial
Heart failure is a neurohormonal and a
hemodynamic syndrome, involving the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), the
sympathetic nervous system, and various neurohumoral substances.
Aldosterone produces a fluid retention and potassium and magnesium loss.
As Aldosterone is the end-product of the
RAAS, an attempt was made inhibiting the conversion of the angiotensin I to angiotensin II
by using ACE-inhibitors.
Morever also inhibiting the activity of ACE, there may be an "escape" of
Aldosterone.
Escape of Aldosterone despite ACE inhibition could be due in part to non-ACE-dependent
angiotensin II production.
In addition the control of Aldosterone production is also under the actions of atrial
natriuretic factor (ANF), corticotropin or serum potassium concentrations.
The RALES trial was planned for assessing
the role of Aldosterone receptor antagonist in the prevention of heart failure and
mortality in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction.
The RALES trial, conducted in 15 countries,
is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial.
In this study were enrolled 1,663 patients, classified as NYHA Class III or IV.
The patients were assigned to two groups of treatment: placebo or Aldosterone receptor
antagonist.
All patients were receiving a stable dose of an ACE inhibitor and loop diuretic.
The Data Safety Monitoring Board, analyzing
the intermediate results, statistically and clinically significant, has halted the RALES
trial, originally scheduled to conclude in December, 1999.
Among the 1,663 patients randomized, there
were 372 deaths (44%) in the placebo group and 283 deaths (34%) in the Aldosterone
antagonist group. The mortality was decreased by 27%, applying the Kaplan-Meier method.
During the trial 764 (91%) placebo-treated
patients and 663 (81%) Aldosterone antagonist- treated patients had at least one non-fatal
hospitalization, representing 1,317 hospitalizations for the placebo group, and 1,088
hospitalizations for the Aldosterone antagonist group.
The RALES trial indicates that:
Aldosterone antagonist when given in
conjunction with an ACE inhibitor reduces the mortality by 27% in patients with severe
chronic congestive heart failure.
In the group treated with Aldosterone antagonist has been seen an decrease by 22% in the
combined endpoint of non-fatal hospitalizations and total mortality.
[RALES Trial was presented at the 71st
Meeting of the American Heart Association in Dallas (USA), November 11, 1998]
REDUCE
Reduction of restenosis after PTCA, early
administration of Reviparin in a double-blind, unfractioned heparin and placebo controlled
evaluation.
Early clinical
events following PTCA
In the setting of the REDUCE trial, 306
patients were randomized to receive unfractionated heparin / placebo (UFH / placebo) and
306 patients to receive Reviparin, a low molecular weight heparin. Clinical follow-up was
obtained for 601 patients.
| |
UFH /
Placebo
(pts) |
Reviparin
(pts) |
p |
Major acute or
early events (myocardial infarction, re-PTCA, bypass surgery, death) |
29 |
13 |
= 0.027 |
[Preisack M.B. et al., Eur Heart J 1998;
19: 1232-1238]

AZ Guide - Clinical Trial / Heart
Home page
EINTHOVEN.net
|